page 4 of 4
Clemencia's 'added' submission to magistrate Marron at the Court on 8th December 2015
Your honour, I want to submit a few words to the court in writing as well as reading it aloud.
(I pass a copy to the court clerk - one for the magistrate and other for the prosecutor)
Your honour, the last time we met your advice to me was that I learn the meaning of the words: "STRICT LIABILITY" - I did ask Mr. Malaherre my spiritual counsellor of its meaning and he advised me that it implied:
"Ignorance of THE LAW is no excuse" but added that: - -
Since this case was one of conscience, faith, belief and religious ideology, that the 'law' being applied to IT was the "Equal Return" aspect of God's immutable LAW which states as follows:
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" or more simply understanding that: "What you do unto others (kindly or cruelly) will be done unto you at the time and in the place so ordained by the intelligent Creative or Destructive energy essence of God." In other words, whatever energy was used by you or by your servants in interaction with others, has a 'Karmic' comeback.
In consequence of the benign, positive and LOVING ideological POLICY commanded by God, I have in the past and to this day continue to do my best to maintain STRICT OBEDIENCE to God's command to man. In so doing I go my way 'lovingly, peacefully and caringly' as a mental health counsellor and I do forgive my oppressors. (In this case the ATO) This I do because my first allegiance is to God and my conscience so dictates since I know I must never retaliate no matter what the provocation.
Furthermore your honour, my spiritual counsellor advised me that when referring to the words 'Strict Liability,' you were probably referring to my apparent ignorance of 'The State Law or rules,' Laws you administer, but Laws which were being used illegally in this subordinate court to persecute me for my absolute pacifist ideological beliefs. (My Religion)
Since this case is based upon my belief that it is a Constitutional matter, the State Laws were automatically 'voided,' hence my need to operate within the constraints of God's command: ('peace at all times and in all situations.') Equally relevant to this case is the Constitution of your institution, a Constitution which clearly pertains to having the same proviso:
"Do not disturb the peace."
Terence has always advised me that 'constitutionally' within ITS 'superior to State' LAW, I was guaranteed immunity from persecution by the Sovereign constitutional powers, and that it was an illegal activity for any State Law or rules to be used as the basis for an attack on my proven religious ideology. This matter has always been seen by me to be a matter of the ‘Freedom of Religion’ Acts of THE Constitution. (s116 & 46-1)
I have always believed in God and also believed that it was error to fund anyone who was terrorising or causing harm to others. My counsel has advised me to hold fast to my 'peaceful ways' and to never give in to threat or coercion but to always remain trusting in God which I will do to the end of my days.
That is my submission to the court today.
Clemencia Barnes, 8th December 2015